DISCLAIMER NOTICE: This article and all other posts on this blog is intended for educational purposes only. None of these posts constitute legal advice in any way. If you want legal advice, and a wordy, rambling rebuttal of this article, and a dent in your wallet, go see a lawyer.
This is my understanding and it could very well be totally wrong or wrong in places. It is for my readers to decide.
How can we pay an alleged debt? when all we have to pay with is pieces of paper that in itself is a promise to pay.
Each note we have in circulation is a promise to pay! it states that plainly on the face of the note. So we have an alleged debt and
we pay it with more debt, how does that work? to me all we are doing is making a bigger debt, we are digging a bigger hole for ourselves
and our progeny.
All debt notes are borrowed into existence by our signatures as new money, which is really just more debt, so please tell me where
the wealth is? is it in we the people or in the banks? I would say we the people are the value. Our time, and our energy drives the
whole thing, but what do we get for our efforts more debt and if we do not give them our debt notes thereby making the debt bigger,
our property gets stolen.
To me the whole system is a giant private banking *ponzi* scheme and quite possibly a fraud. These accounts were never designed
to balance they were designed to enslave us with mind numbing debt for all of us, our families and our families family. We have been
enslaved to run around a hamster wheel to nowhere until the wheels come off.
It is my understanding that almost all Governments went bankrupt in the early 1930’s. They are all in Chapter 11 bankruptcy, this
would include all Countries in the EU, every single one of them, and we the people of Europe are unwittingly the collateral for a debt
that is not ours as there is no means to pay any debt because the system is designed such that we cannot pay it down, that is deliberate
fraud is it not?
When we receive a letter from a debt collector or a bank we could ask the following questions:
- Validation of the debt (i.e. the actual accounting showing company name with real losses, if any);
- Verification of your claim against me (a sworn affidavit or a hand signed invoice in accordance with The Bills of Exchange Act 1882);
- A copy of the contract signed by both parties and therefore binding both parties to the agreement.
- A certified copy of the Original Note (Credit Agreement), under penalty of perjury and with unlimited liability with confirmation that this Note, has never been sold.
- Furthermore confirm the name of the individual who is the duly authorised representative from your company, who has carried out due diligence under The Money Laundering Regulations 2007 and what actions s/he has taken in relation to this account.
I am currently working on a template for validating an alleged debt which when finalised I will put on it’s own page in the top menu.
For furthering your education on how currency is generated with all it’s hidden secrets take a look at this video below.
If we have a chance and it would be better in the public we could ask a politician the following questions:
1. Do you agree with me that we use fiat currency?
2. Do you also agree with me that fiat currency has no intrinsic value and the only reason it works is because we have faith that shops etc take it in exchange for goods and services?
3. Do you also agree that we cannot pay a debt with another debt?
4. So would you agree that because we are paying a debt with a debt we are creating a bigger debt?
5. Would you agree that the system is therefore fraudulent?
1. He has to answer yes.
2. He has to answer yes.
3. He has to answer yes.
4. He will not want to answer this question.
5. He will not want to answer this question either.
These video’s are the work of Richard Ansah. I am very grateful for this work which increased my poor understanding of Express trusts here is Richards youtube channel. Show your appreciation by visiting his channel and giving a thumbs up and a share. https://www.youtube.com/user/AnsahPhD1
Disclaimer: The following is not legal advise, i am not a lawyer and would never wish to be one.
When ever you receive a document that requires signing be very careful how you sign because just signing your name without qualification will make you liable. Below you will find examples on how to properly sign any document so that you the living man or woman cannot be held liable as you are signing as the authorised representative for the legal person who is dead and has been dead since the day your parents informed the registrar that you are present on the plan(et).
Unbeknown to you there are two of you, one is dead the other very much alive. The all caps name for instance JOHN HENRY DOE is the dead legal fiction, however John Henry Doe is the living man. A better way to show the living man is using the following :John-Henry: Doe. separating the Christian name from the family or clan name. Note the full colon’s before the Christian name and between John-Henry and the surname this is important as it separates the two.
You may also use John-Henry of the Doe family or Doe Clan or even house of Doe. You often see the legal fiction name written as John Henry DOE or MR John Henry Doe or John H DOE or any other combination with one always in full caps. Mr is a military title, if you are not military then Mr or Mrs or Ms does not apply. Living men and women are not titles and never accept being one.
An easy way to start practising the proper signing method is at the bank. Where my body stands I have to go to the bank at least three or for times in the first week of every month, on one of these days I am required to sign a document that proves I have paid my rent into my landlords account. As there is plenty of room on the form I can use the long version 4th down from the top. If you have only a small space use the smallest 6 or 7th down, all are correct and will work.
Below you will find a great video which explains everything you need to know. Yes he is an American but it will work anywhere because the con is used throughout the whole world and we must act now to stop it.
Update: Now I know I’m on the right track because the video seems to have been taken down. I will try to find it again and insert the new link if I find it. Okay found another source – enjoy.
Even if you know absolutely nothing about the law, the education that you receive from reading Common Law Remedy will teach you in minute detail about the secrets “The System” doesn’t want you to know. What you don’t know can and will hurt you (financially and otherwise).
You don’t need to have a law degree to defeat any frivolous traffic citation. You just need to know a few simple concepts and how to assert them in order to avoid the court’s jurisdiction and assert your rights.
You have a right to travel on the thoroughfares of the country uninhibited by statutes, rules or regulations that burden or restrict your movement. And this right to travel freely is secured against interference from any source whatever, whether it be governmental or private. With this information, you will be able to bypass all the typical drama of having to go to court. For instance:
If you ever find yourself attending court in order to defend against a traffic citation, there is only one way you can do so if you wish to prevail in the matter using the common law. But before we disclose that way, let’s become clear about what it means to enter a court in response to a legal matter, and most especially a state or municipal court. Any time a person consents to entering a statutory court they are said to be making an “appearance” and thus “responding ” to a matter. A response to a matter is an indication of having consented to being recognized as a party to the action, thereby resulting in personam jurisdiction. However, if you know that you are not a party to the action, that the other party has demonstrated no authority over you with regard to the matter at hand and is attempting to lure you into a fraudulent matter, then you must take care in how you approach the court in order to seek remedy.
My position of late on going to court has always been: never voluntarily go to court. Live men and women are not meant to be in any place designed solely for the business of fictional entities. When we attend court, we are deemed dead, in fact, they cannot deal with us until we admit to being dead….a legal fiction….a trust. Court is for titled persons: judge, prosecutor, defendant, bailiffs, cops, and attorneys. Live men and women are not recognized, so it makes sense to send in a dead person––an attorney––to handle our cases …. except for one thing: they do not know how the system works, due to their indoctrination. If you can find one to do as you say, then you will prevail, but most of them would rather hang onto their BAR cards than behave honorably. The only thing that dead, fictional entities want from us is our life energy, and the only way they can get it is by our agreement. Without us, they cannot function, so, they are desperate to get us into court, to have us pay the debt which they created by charging the trust.