DISCLAIMER NOTICE: This article and all other posts on this blog is intended for educational purposes only. None of these posts constitute legal advice in any way. If you want legal advice, and a wordy, rambling rebuttal of this article, and a dent in your wallet, go see a lawyer.
This is my understanding and it could very well be totally wrong or wrong in places. It is for my readers to decide.
How can we pay an alleged debt? when all we have to pay with is pieces of paper that in itself is a promise to pay.
Each note we have in circulation is a promise to pay! it states that plainly on the face of the note. So we have an alleged debt and
we pay it with more debt, how does that work? to me all we are doing is making a bigger debt, we are digging a bigger hole for ourselves
and our progeny.
All debt notes are borrowed into existence by our signatures as new money, which is really just more debt, so please tell me where
the wealth is? is it in we the people or in the banks? I would say we the people are the value. Our time, and our energy drives the
whole thing, but what do we get for our efforts more debt and if we do not give them our debt notes thereby making the debt bigger,
our property gets stolen.
To me the whole system is a giant private banking *ponzi* scheme and quite possibly a fraud. These accounts were never designed
to balance they were designed to enslave us with mind numbing debt for all of us, our families and our families family. We have been
enslaved to run around a hamster wheel to nowhere until the wheels come off.
It is my understanding that almost all Governments went bankrupt in the early 1930’s. They are all in Chapter 11 bankruptcy, this
would include all Countries in the EU, every single one of them, and we the people of Europe are unwittingly the collateral for a debt
that is not ours as there is no means to pay any debt because the system is designed such that we cannot pay it down, that is deliberate
fraud is it not?
When we receive a letter from a debt collector or a bank we could ask the following questions:
- Validation of the debt (i.e. the actual accounting showing company name with real losses, if any);
- Verification of your claim against me (a sworn affidavit or a hand signed invoice in accordance with The Bills of Exchange Act 1882);
- A copy of the contract signed by both parties and therefore binding both parties to the agreement.
- A certified copy of the Original Note (Credit Agreement), under penalty of perjury and with unlimited liability with confirmation that this Note, has never been sold.
- Furthermore confirm the name of the individual who is the duly authorised representative from your company, who has carried out due diligence under The Money Laundering Regulations 2007 and what actions s/he has taken in relation to this account.
I am currently working on a template for validating an alleged debt which when finalised I will put on it’s own page in the top menu.
For furthering your education on how currency is generated with all it’s hidden secrets take a look at this video below.
If we have a chance and it would be better in the public we could ask a politician the following questions:
1. Do you agree with me that we use fiat currency?
2. Do you also agree with me that fiat currency has no intrinsic value and the only reason it works is because we have faith that shops etc take it in exchange for goods and services?
3. Do you also agree that we cannot pay a debt with another debt?
4. So would you agree that because we are paying a debt with a debt we are creating a bigger debt?
5. Would you agree that the system is therefore fraudulent?
1. He has to answer yes.
2. He has to answer yes.
3. He has to answer yes.
4. He will not want to answer this question.
5. He will not want to answer this question either.
My position of late on going to court has always been: never voluntarily go to court. Live men and women are not meant to be in any place designed solely for the business of fictional entities. When we attend court, we are deemed dead, in fact, they cannot deal with us until we admit to being dead….a legal fiction….a trust. Court is for titled persons: judge, prosecutor, defendant, bailiffs, cops, and attorneys. Live men and women are not recognized, so it makes sense to send in a dead person––an attorney––to handle our cases …. except for one thing: they do not know how the system works, due to their indoctrination. If you can find one to do as you say, then you will prevail, but most of them would rather hang onto their BAR cards than behave honorably. The only thing that dead, fictional entities want from us is our life energy, and the only way they can get it is by our agreement. Without us, they cannot function, so, they are desperate to get us into court, to have us pay the debt which they created by charging the trust.
Dr. Mark Skidmore: Missing $21 Trillion Means Federal Government Is Lawless by Greg Hunter – USA Watchdog
An analysis of Qanon between The Dark Journalist and Dr Joseph Farrell this is a must see. Summary is “Fear Porn” to “Hope Porn” in other words fear porn is no longer working so they have to change direction and it seems they have gone for hope porn in other words they want you to sit back and do nothing and that would be a very grave mistake.
Q Anon: “Learn to Read the Map” A Cartography of the Globally Organized Corruption Networks: A Treasure Trove of Maps, Diagrams, Org Charts, and Family Trees
Learn to read the map – Qanon
Q Anon: “Learn to Read the Map”
A Cartography of the Globally Organized Corruption Networks: A Treasure Trove of Maps, Diagrams, Org Charts, and Family Trees
Article updated twice on January 9, 2018, now with over three dozen new resources, some very large and high resolution.
If you have additions for this collection,
please get them to the Meme Lab Facebook group.
The material presented below has been collected the old-fashioned way: Google. Aside from Dylan Louis Monroe’s remarkably detailed “Q Web,” nothing is new that the the Alt Media crowd hasn’t had access to, so “Q Anon” didn’t drop any of this. This is a collection of notes and diagrams from a few bloggers and memeologists, that’s it. We are not affiliated with Q Anon nor any organization. All of this information is intended to be shared and reposted, including this article in its entirety.
This is a…
View original post 862 more words
A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law, but by presumptions of the law. Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become fact and are therefore said to stand true. There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record, Public Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of Trustees, Government as Executor/Beneficiary, Executor De Son Tort, Incompetence, and Guilt:
- 1. The Presumption ofPublic Record is that any matter brought before a lower Roman Courts is a matter for the public record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter. Unless openly rebuked and rejected by stating clearly the matter is to…
View original post 1,083 more words