If you are not aware of how much influence the Vatican and the Pope has had over the planet your veil is about to be lifted. There is a preponderance of information to support what I am about to put forth and I am not going to detail every facet of it here. This is simply a generalization for conceptual understanding in relation to this latest revelation.
Disclaimer: this is not to be construed as legal advice, I am not a lawyer and neither would I ever want to be one. If you want legal advice go see a lawyer.
This is just my understanding and I could very well be wrong, it’s up to everyone to come to their own understanding after due diligence.
It is my understanding that when new legislation is made public, it is an offer, it is also my understanding that all Governments are Corporations (check Dunn and Blacksteet) that being true then the new legislation is just an offer to contract (Maritime Law of Merchant). There will be a time limit to accept or reject their offer. If you are silent, then it is presumed that you do not object and the new legislation will most likely pass through all stages of parliament and will be made what they call law, however it is a ‘Statute or ACT’ which apply only to a ‘PERSON’.
We have a couple of problems with legislation going through the board of directors of this corporation (Members of Parliament);
- The Office of the Queen has been made redundant, Royal Assent is gone, she cannot object, and a large piece of evidence for this was when parliament was recently opened and she came in not wearing the Crown and sat without the Crown on her head and not in her full regalia which she has always worn before, WHY?
- The Whip System takes away any MP’s right to vote according to his/her conscious, to vote against the Whip will mean punishment, so they are made to vote along party lines which is usually not consistent with what the people want which is not very democratic; so,
- That’s two of our safeguards of democracy gone!
Which leaves we the men and women who for the most part know jack about what is really going on. So there is apparently an Offer on the table and we have to decide if we agree with this offer or if we disagree with the offer, or maybe we agree in part. So how do we go about making our voices heard? I have to say that I really don’t know who we could send our Notice to but a good guess would be the Attorney General or the Home Secretary using the term near the beginning of the Notice stating ‘notice to principal is notice to agent’ doctrine.
I do know that if the people remain silent (Silence is Consent in Maritime Law) it will be construed to mean we tacitly agree to the legislation and it will pass into law. So we must step up to the plate and take part in this democracy or whatever the heck it is these days and participate. We have no choice as our elected representatives can not really present our verdict to parliament even if they wanted to, as there is the Whip System undermining the correct position of his or her constituents will and they know it.
As I understand it the best way is to use a ‘Conditional Acceptance’ along the lines of (does not cause controversy and keeps you in honour);
I would be pleased to support this legislation on condition that;
- Your terms and conditions
- Your terms and conditions
- Your terms and conditions
I don’t think just stating ‘I do not consent’ (although you could do) would be very fruitful I think we have to have good valid objections especially if the new legislation attempts to hide or erode our rights. Remember we have all our Rights written on many documents, including Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights etc, these are still in force and effect although they hide that fact. Remember we are a ‘Common Law Jurisdiction’, that cannot be taken away, they just try to hide it.
If I am correct in my understanding that the Government is a Corporation then they would have to operate under commercial law of Merchant (Maritime Law – law of the sea) so now you can see why everything has a price and everything is for sale. I understand that the Courts operate as a bank under Maritime Law and why all offences have a price (fine) or imprisonment. If you claim the NAME in this place of business then you are done, you are a ward of court, a ‘thing’ and a thing not being a flesh and blood man or woman can be stored in a warehouse (jail) until payment has been made. There are many websites and youtube video’s telling you about all this stuff, you would be wise to study them.
We must all participate and be fully engaged in the political process with regards to objecting in substance to new bills being written and passed without any word from the men and women, we have been asleep and negligent we have not been participating and we have allowed a bunch of people to act for us and look where we are, do we think we have been well served? I think not, so we must wake up and smell the Coffee as our liberties have almost gone. Participate or be enslaved forever, it’s your choice and you must make it now. Get educated and get to work.
Below is a couple of extracts from a post from freedom school dot com
Lincoln Establishes Executive Orders
Eighty-five years after the Independence of the united States, seven southern nation States of America walked out of the Second Session of the thirty-sixth Congress on March 27, 1861. In so doing, the Constitutional due process quorum necessary for Congress to vote was lost and Congress was adjourned sine die, or “without day.” This meant that there was no lawful quorum to set a specific day and time to reconvene which, according to Robert’s Rules of Order, dissolved Congress. This dissolution automatically took place because there are no provisions within the Constitution allowing the passage of any Congressional vote without a quorum of the States.
Lincoln’s second Executive Order of April 1861 called Congress back into session days later, but not under the lawful authority, or lawful due process, of the Constitution. Solely in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the US Military, Lincoln called Congress into session under authority of Martial Law. Since April of 1861, “Congress” has not met based on lawful due process. The current “Congress” is a legal fiction based on nothing more meritorious than “Yeah, so what are you going to do about it?” Having a monopoly on the currency, “law,” and what passes for “government,” and most of the world’s firepower, the motto of the Powers That Be is: “We’ve got what it takes to take what you’ve got.”
Legal-fiction “laws,” such as the Reconstruction Acts and the implementation of the Lieber Code, were instituted by Lincoln soon thereafter and became the basis for the current “laws” in the US. Every purported “Act” in effect today is “de facto,” based on colorable fictitious entities created arbitrarily, out of nothing, without verification, lawful foundation, or lawful due process. All of such “laws” are not law, but rules of rulership by force/conquest, originating from and existing in military, martial law jurisdiction.
Military, martial law jurisdiction
= jurisdiction of war
= win/lose interactions consisting of eating or being eaten, living or dying
= food chain
= law of necessity
= suspension of all law other than complete freedom to act in any manner to eat, kill, or destroy or avoid
being eaten, killed, or destroyed
= no law
= complete absence of all lawful basis to create any valid law.
Contractually, being a victim of those acting on the alleged authority granted by the law of necessity,
= no lawful object, valuable consideration, free consent of all involved parties,
absence of fraud, duress, malice, and undue influence
= no bona fide, enforceable contract
= no valid, enforceable nexus
= absolute right to engage in any action of any kind in self-defense
= complete and total right to disregard any alleged jurisdiction and demands from self-admitted
outlaws committing naked criminal aggression without any credibility and right to demand
allegiance and compliance from anyone.
Every President of the United States since Lincoln has functioned by Executive Orders issued from a military, martial law jurisdiction with the only “law” being the “law of necessity,” i.e. the War Powers. The War Powers are nothing new. Indeed, they have been operational from the instant the first man thought he would “hide from God,” try to cheat ethical and natural law by over reaching, invade the space and territory of others, covet other people’s land or property, steal the fruits of their labors, and attempt to succeed in life by win/lose games. All existing “authority” in the United States today derives exclusively from the War Powers. Truman’s re-affirmation of operational authority under the War Powers begins: “NOW, THEREFORE, I, HARRY S. TRUMAN, President of the United States of America, acting under and by virtue of the authority vested in me by section 5(b) of the Trading with the Enemy Act of October 6, 1917, 40 Stat. 415, as amended (section 5(b) of Appendix to Title 50), and section 4 of the act of March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 2. …” Sic transit rights, substance, truth, justice, peace, and freedom in America, “the land of the free and the home of the brave.”
Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only. I am not a lawyer and I never want to be one. Do you own research on these subjects and know what you’re doing before committing yourself to any process.
Bank bail-ins are not theft. The law* has been in existence for hundreds of years and was established in England by the House of Lords in the case Foley v Hill in 1848.
Silence is consent
When governments issue ‘Public Notice’ http://gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2017/2017-06-17/html/reg4-eng.php and few people speak up, public silence is tacit or implied consent for the government to proceed. This is the Great con of man, the con hidden in one tiny word ‘consent’.
[Please read the full post linked below for context. Although this is pacific to Canada, silence is consent is the same everywhere, at least in the West.]
This is my understanding and it’s very possible that it is incorrect in all or in part therefore do your own due diligence and do the research yourself so that you are aware with knowing and not aware through hearsay.
Being silent is consent has been used for a very long time but is it really true? If I was say sending an affidavit to a public official and for arguments sake lets say he is a man I must ensure that the man is addressed directly and not the Office he holds otherwise he would hide behind the Office, everyone in public office is liable as a flesh and blood being for his actions. In laying out the affidavit it would be wise to state for the record that if he fails to respond within the time limit you set for rebuttal with substance that you would assume that he is guilty as detailed in the affidavit, so he now has a choice to rebut with substance or to ignore at his peril. If you write your affidavit leaving out this crucial body of words then there is a route of escape is there not?
As a sidebar to this I would say signing a petition has it’s place, but for answering public notices such as white papers, new legislation and what have you the best course of action is to send in your own notice of non-consent in your own words which is very powerful and even more so if they receive thousands upon thousands of do not consent notices. Make sure you send it via registered post, take a photograph of the receipt and the envelope you send as evidence. this way you can prove you sent the notice and that it was received.
Be aware the people really do have the power but do not act in accordance with this reality. We the people created government to safeguard and protect our unalienable rights and our property, so government is below us in standing because we created the concept of government to act for us. He who creates, controls and therefore by definition are subordinate to we the people who create it. The only entity above man is God. All men are created equal in standing and in law.
The people have lost control of the concept of government because we do not and did not question their so called authority and we remained silent when we should have been shouting very loudly and sending I do not consent notices to our representatives in Office, they are not in power as they keep alluding to, they are in Office and are our public servants, not our masters.
On and for the record I am Pro-honest Constitutional Government as created.
On and for the record I am Pro-Peace Officer and/or Constable there by consent of the public to keep the peace as originally created.
On and for the record I do not condone, violence in any form, mental or psychical, deception, corruption in public office, coercion by any entity, and fraud in all it’s guises.
It is my understanding that authoring an affidavit is a three step process if done correctly, Step one the original sworn affidavit of plain facts. Step two if no rebuttal, a reminder to answer the affidavit which is usually a repeat of the first with an added paragraph that it is a reminder. Step three if no rebuttal, the default judgement of guilty of all that is laid out in the original affidavit. All of these steps may be notarised by a public notary, or if none can be found then have each step witnessed by three of your peers who know you well but is not a family members as it appears three people have the same power as a notary. Each step separated by at least seven (7) days so as to give the opportunity to rebut all claims with evidence and substance.
So armed with this knowledge if you see any Public Notice by Government or any agent or official entity that you do not agree with then write to the man or woman acting in the office that published the Public Notice or the Attorney General if new legislation that clearly takes away any of the rights we have under the guise of security, clearly stating your objection(s), hopefully many thousands of people will do the same. Because if you say nothing then it will be construed rightly or wrongly as consent.
Penalty Charge Notices (PCN)
How many people are paying Penalty Charge Notices each and every day? I have no real idea but I would guess quite a few thousand all over the UK every single day.
Fixed Penalty Notices: Fraudulent coercion of voluntary payments. This article reveals your ‘PERSON’ and how your are deceived into believing that you are a ‘Person’ thereby confessing your guilt and asking for your punishment. Below are three very useful links to save you time for your education.
It behooves us to be eternally vigilant of what is going on around us. Keep up with what Statutes are being prepared and send out notices of non-consent as required, hard work, yes and if you value your liberty then it’s the price everyone must pay to stay on top of what is going on and to nip it in the bud as and when necessary.
You Can Discharge Almost Any Debt with Proper Use of the UCC
You can discharge Secured Loans, Credit Card Debt, Student Loans, Auto Loans, Assessments, Citations, Debts, Demands, Fines, Penalties, Tax Liens and Judgments.
Debt Discharge and “Accepted for Value” is based on understanding how you’ve been mislead and learning what to do about it.
You just have to know How to Do It!
THE HIDDEN EMPIRE :The Vatican City : The City of London : The District of Columbia : Now that is who really owns us and how
THE HIDDEN EMPIRE1. City States.
Distinguished research psychologist Robert Epstein explains why Google was recently fined $2.7 billion for one of its search-engine manipulations. This is just the beginning, he says, of bad news for a company that tracks and manipulates people on a massive scale.
Dr. Robert Epstein — The pixels have hit the fan. The EU just fined Google $2.7 billion for favoring its online comparative shopping service in its search results.
Google officials knew this fine was coming and that much worse is possible, so in August 2015, they reorganized the company so that it is now part of a holding company called Alphabet. This was not done, as Larry Page, one of the company’s co-founders, rappedat the time, to make the company “cleaner and more accountable” (what on earth does that mean?). It was likely done to try to protect the value of the stock held by the company’s major stockholders. The EU’s antitrust action against Google had been filedin April, 2015, and that got Google officials thinking. When the US Department of Justice broke up AT&T in the 1980s, the stock value dropped by 70 percent.