Denial of Consent to Register Children – A Repost From Escapee’s Blog

“This is a sanitised process used by my partner and I to deny our consent to register the births of our children.

NOTICE OF DECLARATION OF DENIAL OF CONSENT TO REGISTER CHILDREN

NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

Dear CAROLINE SHORT-TEMPERED,

Following today’s receipt of your letter dated 07 May 2010, the contents of which are hereby refused for cause without dishonour; please find enclosed a DECLARATION OF DENIAL OF CONSENT TO REGISTER CHILDREN.

We trust this presentment brings this matter to a swift and efficient conclusion. Kindly update your records accordingly.

Without malice, mischief, ill-will, frivolity or vexation; in sincerity and honour,

Document source.

Email to the General Register Office in the UK

Due to recent developments about the legal name I may have to take down a few pages tabbed at the top of this blog because if this information is true then I cannot copyright my name even if done using common law;

Following these developments and watching the video’s put out by Hannah Rose on http://losethename.com/hannah-rose/I took a leaf out of Hannah Rose’s book doing my due diligence and emailed the following to the Head of GRO:

===========================================================================

To the head of GRO,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

At the bottom the birth certificate there is a statement which
reads as follows;

CAUTION:  THERE ARE OFFENCES RELATING TO FALSIFYING OR ALTERING
A CERTIFICATE  (C) CROWN COPYRIGHT

ALSO

Warning: A CERTIFICATE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF IDENTITY.

These statements have been brought to my attention and I need
clarification on meanings of these two statements and why we
have been encouraged by government and all it’s agencies to
use names which on the face of it looks as though they are
Crown Copyright.

Because of the possibility of breaching Crown Copyright I am
not going to use the full name but use my given name which
I believe is not copyright which also needs clarifying.

Please reply in substance to this inquiry as it is of the utmost
urgency because on the 7th May there is going to be a general
election where everyone voting will be using there copyrighted
name and will be committing mass Copyright fraud.

If I receive no reply within the next seven days (7) days then I
have to assume that the name is Crown Copyright and that
everyone should stop using it.

—
Clive-Albert

===========================================================================

It will be very interested to receive a reply, I don’t expect one but who knows. If I receive a reply
I will of course put it up on the blog for everyone to see.

People who know me call me Clive

I have in my possession a piece of paper called a birth certificate and on that paper it has printed a column entitled “name if any” and in that column is written in long hand Clive Albert. At the very bottom written in red bold type appears the following statement “WARNING: A CERTIFICATE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF IDENTITY.” It also states that it is Crown Copyright. This certificate is a notice of an event which took place somewhere on a piece of land on Planet Earth. The only people with first hand knowledge of this event are now long dead, there is no affidavit of truth signed and witnessed by anyone who was present at this alleged birth so this event is hearsay.

So this Birth Certificate is the property of the Crown as is the “NAME” Therefore if we lay claim to that “NAME” on that paper in the public we are in breach of copyright right law. So why in court when asked to state the “NAME” we do so? and by doing that we lay claim to it and any liability that comes with it. Which is why you will now have to pay for the crime in some way. Do not lay claim to the “NAME” it is not yours to claim.

You can say you are “a peaceful inhabitant” and you may call me friend or whatever name you wish to be known by.

There is a process called “The Four Corners” and it goes like this:

“For and on the record, I am here for this matter under threat and duress to correct a mistake as I have never been properly noticed and I want to deal with this matter honorably.”
Here is the break down of the four corners;

1. I am here for this matter under threat and duress.
2. to correct a mistake.
3. I have never been properly noticed (No meeting of the minds)
4. so I’m here to deal with this matter honorably.

Here you will find four audio files by Wendy which will give more details of this process;

https://www.4shared.com/dir/o_HkAGRf/The_4_Corners_-_Wendy.html

For more insight into the four corners listen to Episodes 7,8,9 and 10 on this talkshoe call;
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=44889&am…

I believe this is our remedy for the problems humanity has. We have to learn who we are and who we are not, we must be peaceful and honorable.

 

I wish everyone peace.