Due to recent developments about the legal name I may have to take down a few pages tabbed at the top of this blog because if this information is true then I cannot copyright my name even if done using common law;
Following these developments and watching the video’s put out by Hannah Rose on http://losethename.com/hannah-rose/I took a leaf out of Hannah Rose’s book doing my due diligence and emailed the following to the Head of GRO:
===========================================================================
To the head of GRO,
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
At the bottom the birth certificate there is a statement which
reads as follows;
CAUTION: THERE ARE OFFENCES RELATING TO FALSIFYING OR ALTERING
A CERTIFICATE (C) CROWN COPYRIGHT
ALSO
Warning: A CERTIFICATE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF IDENTITY.
These statements have been brought to my attention and I need
clarification on meanings of these two statements and why we
have been encouraged by government and all it’s agencies to
use names which on the face of it looks as though they are
Crown Copyright.
Because of the possibility of breaching Crown Copyright I am
not going to use the full name but use my given name which
I believe is not copyright which also needs clarifying.
Please reply in substance to this inquiry as it is of the utmost
urgency because on the 7th May there is going to be a general
election where everyone voting will be using there copyrighted
name and will be committing mass Copyright fraud.
If I receive no reply within the next seven days (7) days then I
have to assume that the name is Crown Copyright and that
everyone should stop using it.
—
Clive-Albert
===========================================================================
It will be very interested to receive a reply, I don’t expect one but who knows. If I receive a reply
I will of course put it up on the blog for everyone to see.
Alternativeaction Blog 